The following are not suggested rates. They are a selection of rates recently reported to the Rate for the Job service - if any were found for Photography / Online use of photos. Please note that these are self-reported; they are rates that the reporter was not dissatisfied with, but standards of dissatisfaction vary; and that a computer sorted them on the basis of these self-reports so some randomness is possible.
The second figure, where given, is for additional rights (use on the web, etc).
Read me first! Online use of photos advice
Back to suggested rates for Online use of photos
| Photography / online - know a (better) rate? tell us! | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006_01 | _Pearson | Financial Times | |||
| one photographic job, |  | 130 | |||
| 2007_04 | _GMG | Manchester Evening News | |||
| picture, 7 day online licence | | 425 | |||
| 2007_04 | _GMG | Manchester Evening News | |||
| picture, 1 day online licence | | 85 | |||
| 2008_04 | Artists website and publications | ||||
| per day shooting paintings and sculptures for website, book and marketing, post production, hire of equipment and expenses , - no terms stated as photographer "undertook without knowing" | | 350 | |||
NUJ members discuss rates etc for photography Generally useful links:
![[www.londonfreelance.org]](gif/nujsma.gif)
Rates for the Job good, bad and ugly
www.londonfreelance.org much more information...
Join the NUJ to get individual advice & representation
The National Union of Journalists must not, can not and would not wish to dictate rates or terms of engagement to members or to editors. The information presented here is for guidance and as an aid to equitable negotiation only.
Suggestions apply to contracts governed by UK law only. In any event, nothing here should be construed as legal advice.
Fees Guide home