Photographers win in record time

ON AUGUST 28 photographers contributing to Inside Communications' publications received one of those all-rights letters, but including a slight smokescreen. And the very next day the magazine relented.

"It is necessary," the magazine wrote, "for Inside Communications to be sure that all contributors and freelance workers are responsible for their own tax and national insurance. At the same time," and by the bye, "we are taking the opportunity to up-date our paperwork relating to Copyright." There followed a comprehensive rights-grab.

Member Andrew Wiard was quite happy to supply the tax details, though he couldn't resist pointing out that they were printed on every invoice he'd sent over the years. The rest of his reply is worth reproducing in full here:

28 August 2001

Thank you for your letter which I received this morning. I do understand it is "necessary to be sure that all contributors and freelance workers are responsible for their own tax and national insurance", but in the case of a long standing contributor like myself I think Inside Communications has always been quite clear about that, despite changes in offices & ownership over the years. So I find it surprising that I should be required to confirm this in writing, particularly as all my invoices are VAT invoices, complete with VAT number. And I cannot see why, if you do not receive the signed declaration to that effect "by the end of September there could be a delay processing future invoices". May I remind you my terms always have been, and remain, thirty days.

I certify that any amount claimed by me for work done on behalf of Inside Communcations is paid gross and that I am fully responsible for any tax and National Insurance which may be payable.

The rest of your "Contributors' Declaration" however is quite outrageous, and I have no intention whatsoever of signing it. You claim you are "taking the opportunity to up-date our paperwork relating to Copyright". In fact you are attempting to grab all my rights...

After all this time it would have been a pleasant surprise to get a few words addressed to me personally - maybe saying how much you have valued my contributions over the years. But a little note grabbing all my rights! Get lost!

In view of the seriousness of this I am copying this letter to those I supply at Inside Housing, the editor & picture desk staff, and to as many freelances as I can who could possibly be affected."

As you appear completely ignorant of the basis upon which I have been supplying Inside Housing since the late eighties, and may not be alone in this, I must ask you to do your best to ensure that all those at Inside Communications who need to know are now aware that under the Copyright Design and Patents Act 1988 I always retain copyright in work supplied to your organisation, have always done so, and will under no circumstances sign it away.

Let me spell it out: for stock photographs I supply one single editorial print use in one edition. And I certainly do not guarantee that it is "not published elsewhere", in the words of your poorly drafted document, which fails to distinguish between these & commissioned work. For commissioned material you do indeed get first publication, but this is limited to immediate editorial print use in one edition only. Other rights can be negotiated, of course, but not the sale of copyright itself.

And in these circumstances, I need to ask for assurances which I have never felt necessary in the past. Everything I supply Inside Communications carries my copyright notice. I now need it confirmed that no-one will tamper with or remove my copyright notices from my material which is in your possession. I must also insist that my material held on file, physical or electronic, at Inside Housing, is not accessible to or handed over to any other title or library in your organisation, to the libraries of its current or future owners, or for that matter to anyone else.

I have always given Inside Housing my best work, & hope to continue to do so. But not if any of my invoices are subject to mysterious delays.

The bit about "copying this letter... to freelances", of course, nowadays means that Andrew circulated his response on the Editorial Photo UK email list - see - and it reached most of the photographers concerned. It rapidly emerged that the picture desk had nothing to do with all this. So the company very quickly saw that the move was counterproductive. It is now asking photographers to delete this clause, then sign and return the rest.

There is a snag. The company is still trying to grab rights from freelance writers working from its offices. If you're one, please get in contact with Ros Bayley: email

Last modified: 15 September 2001 - © 2001 contributors
The Freelance editor is elected by London Freelance Branch and responsibility for content lies solely with the editor of the time
Send comments to the editor: